Garrick

Garrick v. Garrick

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 21, 20234:22-cv-04549California5,158 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 OWEN GARRICK, Case No. 22-cv-04549-JST

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART ANTI-SLAPP

MOTIONS TO STRIKE AND

JOCELYN FREEMAN GARRICK, et al., MOTIONS TO DISMISS Defendants. Re: ECF Nos. 15 &

12 Before the Court are Defendants’ anti-SLAPP motions to strike and motions to dismiss ECF Nos. 15 & 20. The Court will grant the motions in part and deny them in part. I. BACKGROUND For purposes of the instant motion, the Court accepts the following as true. Owen Garrick (“Garrick”) and Jocelyn Freeman Garrick (“Freeman Garrick”) are physicians in Alameda County. Compl. ¶ 21, ECF No. 10. They are married but separated, and their divorce proceedings are ongoing. Id. ¶ 20. Garrick alleges that Freeman Garrick abused “her considerable power, authority, and contacts within Alameda County to harass” him, and to “gain an advantage in their pending divorce proceedings.” Id. Garrick alleges…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.