Rothschild
Rothschild v. The Pacific Companies
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 THOMAS ETIENNE ROTHSCHILD, Case No. 23-cv-01721-LJC
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING IFP
v. APPLICATION; SCREENING
COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C.
THE PACIFIC COMPANIES, § 1915(E)(2)(B); GRANTING MOTION
TO AMEND
Defendant. 11 ECF Nos. 1, 12,
12 Plaintiff Thomas Etienne Rothschild filed his Complaint and an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP). ECF Nos. 1, 12. Plaintiff also filed a Motion to Amend Complaint, Add Defendants, and Correct Venue (Motion to Amend). ECF No. 15. The Court finds that Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend is appropriate for disposition without oral argument. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). Accordingly, the hearing on the Motion to Amend, set for July 10, 2023, at 9:00 A.M. is VACATED. Having considered Plaintiff’s papers, the Court GRANTS the IFP application and finds that the Complaint fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). The Court also GRANTS…