Langmead

Apex.AI, Inc. v. Langmead

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 23, 20235:23-cv-02230California1,342 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 APEX.AI, INC, Case No. 5:23-cv-02230-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF

v. APEX.AI, INC.’S ADMINISTRATIVE

MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL

NEIL RICHARD LANGMEAD, AN PORTIONS OF ITS MEMORANDUM

INDIVIDUAL; VERIFA, INC., A IN SUPPORT OF THE EX PARTE

MASSACHUSETTS CORPORATION; APPLICATION FOR A TEMPORARY

CODECLINIC, LLC DBA LATTIZ, A RESTRAINING ORDER AND

MASSACHUSETTS LIMITED DECLARATIONS IN SUPPORT

LIABILITY COMPANY; AND DOES 1- THEREOF

20, [Re: ECF 5] Defendants.

15 This action arises from a dispute between Plaintiff Apex.AI, Inc. (“Apex.AI”) and Defendants, Neil Richard Langmead (“Langmead”), Verifa, Inc. (“Verifa”), and CodeClinic LLC dba Lattix (“CodeClinic”). The dispute is regarding alleged trade secret misappropriation and breach of a Consulting Agreement. Langmead, hired by Apex.AI under a Consulting Agreement, was tasked to ensure…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.