Langmead
Apex.AI, Inc. v. Langmead
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 23, 20235:23-cv-02230California1,342 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 APEX.AI, INC, Case No. 5:23-cv-02230-BLF
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF
v. APEX.AI, INC.’S ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
NEIL RICHARD LANGMEAD, AN PORTIONS OF ITS MEMORANDUM
INDIVIDUAL; VERIFA, INC., A IN SUPPORT OF THE EX PARTE
MASSACHUSETTS CORPORATION; APPLICATION FOR A TEMPORARY
CODECLINIC, LLC DBA LATTIZ, A RESTRAINING ORDER AND
MASSACHUSETTS LIMITED DECLARATIONS IN SUPPORT
LIABILITY COMPANY; AND DOES 1- THEREOF
20, [Re: ECF 5] Defendants.
15 This action arises from a dispute between Plaintiff Apex.AI, Inc. (“Apex.AI”) and Defendants, Neil Richard Langmead (“Langmead”), Verifa, Inc. (“Verifa”), and CodeClinic LLC dba Lattix (“CodeClinic”). The dispute is regarding alleged trade secret misappropriation and breach of a Consulting Agreement. Langmead, hired by Apex.AI under a Consulting Agreement, was tasked to ensure…