Richter

Richter v. Oracle America, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 15, 20235:22-cv-04795California3,665 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 HAONING RICHTER, Case No. 22-cv-04795-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART WITHOUT

PREJUDICE MOTION FOR

ORACLE AMERICA, INC., SANCTIONS Defendant. [Re: ECF No. 49]

12 Defendant Oracle America, Inc. (“Oracle”) seeks sanctions in the amount of $152,067.07 against Plaintiff and her counsel under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 11. The Court previously vacated the hearing on the motion, finding it suitable for submission without oral argument. See ECF No. 57; Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons discussed below, the motion for sanctions is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. I. BACKGROUND The background of this case was laid out in detail in the Court’s Orders denying the preliminary injunction and granting the motion to dismiss. See Richter v. Oracle Am., Inc., No. 22-cv-04795-BLF, 2023 WL 350405 (N.D.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.