Pinzon

Pinzon v. Mendocino County Sheriff's Office

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 23, 20233:23-cv-01571California3,252 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ABRAHAM G. PINZON, Case No. 23-cv-01571-AMO

Plaintiff,

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH LEAVE

v. TO AMEND

MENDOCINO COUNTY SHERIFF'S Re: Dkt. Nos. 1, 5, 7 OFFICE, et al., 11 Defendants.

12 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Abraham G. Pinzon filed a pro se civil rights action in which he alleged violations of his rights under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as well as additional causes of action that arise under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. ECF No. 1 (“Compl.”). Venue is proper because the events giving rise to the claim are alleged to have occurred in Mendocino County, which is located in this judicial district. See 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). Pinzon names the following defendants: Mendocino County Sherriff’s Office and the California Highway Patrol (“Defendants”). Pinzon also seeks appointment of counsel. ECF No. 5. The Court now reviews the sufficiency of Pinzon’s complaint to determine whether it…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.