Splunk Inc. v. Cribl, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SPLUNK INC., Plaintiff, No. C 22-07611 WHA
v.
CRIBL, INC. and CLINT SHARP, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO AMEND
Defendants.
15 INTRODUCTION Following the order granting in part and denying in part defendants’ motion to dismiss, plaintiff moves for leave to file an amended complaint. For the reasons stated herein, plaintiff’s motion is DENIED. STATEMENT The order on the motion to dismiss described the purported facts at issue (Dkt. No. 55 at 1–3). Briefly, they are as follows. Patent and copyright owner Splunk Inc. was founded in 2003 and runs a platform for analyzing large volumes of data. Its flagship product, Splunk Enterprise, ingests flows of data from disparate sources and indexes that data, allowing customers to interact with and monitor their data in real time. Through its Technology Alliance Partner (“TAP”) program, Splunk grants partners a license to…