Chapman

Chapman v. San Mateo County

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 26, 20234:21-cv-09038California511 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MARCEL E. CHAPMAN, Case No. 21-cv-09038-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF

TIME NUNC PRO TUNC; DENYING

v. REQUEST FOR COUNSEL

SAN MATEO COUNTY, Re: Dkt. Nos. 28, 29 Defendant.

12 Plaintiff, an inmate housed at Maple Correctional Facility in Redwood City, California, has filed this pro se action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court has granted Defendant’s motion for summary judgment and granted Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint. Dkt. No. 38. This order addresses Plaintiff’s request for an extension of time to file his opposition, Dkt. No. 28, and his request for appointment of counsel, Dkt. No. 29. The Court GRANTS nunc pro tunc Plaintiff’s request for an extension of time to file his opposition, Dkt. No. 28, and deems Plaintiff’s opposition, Dkt. No. 30, timely filed. Plaintiff has requested appointment of counsel, arguing that counsel is necessary because he is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.