Moonbug Entertainment Limited v. Babybus (Fujian) Network Technology Co., Ltd

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MOONBUG ENTERTAINMENT Case No. 21-cv-06536-EMC LIMITED, et al., 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS’ AND DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO v. EXCLUDE EXPERT TESTIMONY 10 BABYBUS (FUJIAN) NETWORK Docket Nos. 287-290, 294, 302 TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD, et al.,

Defendants.

13 14 Prior to trial, Plaintiffs Moonbug Entertainment Limited and Treasure Studio, Inc. (collectively, “Moonbug”) and Defendants BabyBus Co., Ltd. and BabyBus (Fujian) Network Technology Co., Ltd. (“BabyBus Tech.”) (collectively, “BabyBus”) have filed Daubert motions to exclude the opinions of six experts. See Docket Nos. 287, 288, 289, 290 (Moonbug’s Daubert motions); Docket Nos. 294, 302 (Babybus’ Daubert motions). The Court addresses each motion in turn. I. LEGAL STANDARD Federal Rule of Evidence 702 tasks a district judge with “ensuring that an expert’s testimony both rests on a reliable foundation and is relevant to…