Anoke
Anoke v. Twitter, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SARAH ANOKE, et al., Case No. 23-cv-02217-SI
Petitioners, ORDER REMANDING ACTION TO
STATE COURT
v. Re: Dkt. No. 24 TWITTER, INC., et al., Respondents.
12 Petitioners have filed a motion to remand this action to state court. Dkt. No. 24. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds this matter appropriate for resolution without oral argument and VACATES the hearing scheduled for June 30, 2023. For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS petitioners’ motion to remand but DENIES petitioners’ request for attorneys’ fees and costs. 18 BACKGROUND Petitioners in this case are fifteen individuals, all former employees of Twitter, Inc., who assert that they executed arbitration agreements with Twitter as a condition of their employment. Dkt. No. 1-1, Pet. at 4. The arbitration agreements provided for arbitration with JAMS. Id. On February 24, 2023, petitioners each filed a demand for…