Treez, Inc. v. United States Department of Homeland Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 27, 20233:22-cv-07027California3,184 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TREEZ, INC., et al., Case No. 22-cv-07027-RS (TSH)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. COMPEL SUPPLEMENTATION OF

DEFENDANTS’ CERTIFIED

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD HOMELAND SECURITY, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 38 Defendants. 12 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Treez, Inc., and Ameya Pethe bring this suit under the Administrative Procedures Act (“APA”), alleging Defendants1 wrongfully denied their H1-B visa petition. Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion for an order compelling Defendants to supplement the Administrative Record. ECF No. 38. Defendants filed an opposition and cross-motion for a protective order prohibiting extra-record discovery (ECF No. 41), Plaintiffs filed a reply (ECF No. 42), and Defendants filed a reply in support of their cross-motion (ECF No. 44). The Court finds this matter suitable for disposition without oral argument and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.