Reyes

Reyes v. Federal Express Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 23, 20233:23-cv-00693California3,604 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAUL REYES, Case No. 23-cv-00693-AMO

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION TO REMAND

FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION, Re: Dkt. No. 16 Defendant.

12 Before the Court is Plaintiff Reyes’s motion to remand the case to state court. The matter is fully briefed and suitable for decision without oral argument. Accordingly, the hearings set for July 6, 2023, and September 14, 2023, are VACATED. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby rules as follows. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background Reyes allegedly worked for Defendant Federal Express Corporation (“FedEx”) as an hourly, non-exempt employee from March 2019 to September 2020. First Amended Complaint (“FAC,” ECF 14) ¶ 18. Reyes alleges that FedEx required him to use his personal cellphone to perform his job duties, including…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.