Maslic

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 SASA MASLIC, et al., Case No. 21-cv-02556-BLF

Plaintiffs,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

v. DEFENDANTS ISM VUZEM USA, INC.

AND VUZEM USA, INC. SHOULD NOT

ISM VUZEM D.O.O., et al., BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO

EFFECT SERVICE OF PROCESS

Defendants.

14 It appears from the docket that Defendants ISM Vuzem USA, Inc. and Vuzem USA, Inc. have not been served. Those defendants are alleged to be a South Carolina corporation and a California corporation, respectively. See Corrected First Am’d Compl. ¶¶ 5-6, ECF 63. Accordingly, Plaintiffs were required to serve them within 90 days after the complaint was filed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) (“If a defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court--on motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff--must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made within a specified…