In re Clean Water Act Rulemaking

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 29, 20233:20-cv-04636California998 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

In re No. C 20-04636 WHA No. C 20-04869 WHA CLEAN WATER ACT No. C 20-06137 WHA

RULEMAKING.

This Document Relates to: (Consolidated)

ALL ACTIONS. ORDER RE RENEWED MOTION

TO REMAND WITHOUT VACATUR

16 Our court of appeals sent this case back on an open record for reconsideration of the EPA’s motion to remand without vacatur. It noted that a district court has “broad discretion” to deny a voluntary remand and proceed to decide the merits “if the risk of harm from indefinitely leaving an allegedly unlawful rule in place outweighs considerations of judicial and administrative efficiency.” In re Clean Water Act Rulemaking, 60 F.4th 583, 596 (9th Cir. 2023). Prior orders requested briefing to assist the undersigned in making this determination (Dkt. Nos. 216, 218, 220, 221). Upon review of the briefing, this order finds that the risk of harm does not outweigh the efficiency considerations here for the following reasons. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.