Tigo Energy Inc. v. SunSpec Alliance

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 28, 20233:23-cv-00762California7,132 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 TIGO ENERGY INC., Case No. 23-cv-00762-WHO

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART MOTION TO

DISMISS

SUNSPEC ALLIANCE, Re: Dkt. No. 19 Defendant.

13 Defendant SunSpec Alliance (“SunSpec”) moves to dismiss this case brought by plaintiff Tigo Energy Inc. (“Tigo”), which alleges what appears to be a novel theory: that SunSpec infringed on one of its patents when it set an industry standard for a “rapid shutdown system” (“RSS”) for solar panels. The motion is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part, with leave to amend. Tigo has plausibly alleged that SunSpec infringed on the asserted claims, literally and under the doctrine of equivalents, by directing its affiliated laboratories to test third party products in accordance with its specification. By testing those products, the labs plausibly “use” or “make” the claimed systems, and by allegedly doing so under SunSpec’s direction and control, it is plausible that …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.