Martinez

Martinez v. County of Alameda

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 3, 20233:20-cv-06570California454 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 LISAMARIA MARTINEZ, Case No. 20-cv-06570-TSH

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: MOTIONS FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT, LEAVE TO

AMEND

COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 61, 63, 79 Defendants.

12 In ECF No. 44, the Court denied Plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment and declaratory judgment and granted in part and denied in part Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Thereafter the Court held a case management conference. Both sides requested that the Court determine whether the County is required to provide scribe services under the ADA. The parties then filed cross motions for summary judgment on this issue. Having reviewed the parties’ briefing, the Court finds that it cannot issue an order that is specific to scribe services. Title II of the ADA states that “no qualified individual with a disability shall, by reason of such disability, be excluded from participation in or be denied the benefits of the services,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.