Glow Natural Health Ministry v. United States

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 2, 20233:23-cv-01252California1,583 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA San Francisco Division Case No. 23-cv-01252-LB

GLOW NATURAL HEALTH MINISTRY,

12 et al., SCREENING ORDER 13 Plaintiffs, Re: ECF No. 1 14 v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

16 Defendant. 17 The plaintiffs are Juli Anne Mazi and an entity affiliated with her.1 She represents herself and is proceeding in forma pauperis. Before directing the United States Marshal to serve the defendants with the complaint, the court must screen it for minimal legal viability. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The complaint — which is hundreds of pages with attachments — appears to be an impermissible collateral attack on the criminal conviction. Nonetheless, in case there is anything viable in the attachments, the court allows an opportunity to amend in one document without voluminous attachments.

1 She spells the name differently in the caption, but this way elsewhere, and her criminal case reflects this spelling. Compl. – ECF No. 1; United States v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.