Lamontagne
Lamontagne v. Tesla, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 THOMAS LAMONTAGNE, Case No. 23-cv-00869-AMO
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING OAKLAND
v. COUNTY’S MOTION TO APPOINT
LEAD PLAINTIFF AND LEAD
TESLA, INC., et al., COUNSEL Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 14, 20, 27,
12 In this putative securities class action, Plaintiff Oakland County Voluntary Employees’ Beneficiary Association (“Oakland County VEBA”) and Oakland County Employees’ Retirement System (“Oakland County ERS” and together with Oakland County VEBA, “Oakland County”) filed a motion to be appointed as lead plaintiff pursuant to the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (“PSLRA”), 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4(a)(3)(B). ECF 14. Oakland County also seeks appointment of its counsel, Labaton Sucharow LLP (“Labaton Sucharow”) as lead counsel, and Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP (“Hagens Berman”) as liaison counsel for the putative class. Id. The motion is unopposed. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds…