Lamontagne

Lamontagne v. Tesla, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 5, 20233:23-cv-00869California1,918 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 THOMAS LAMONTAGNE, Case No. 23-cv-00869-AMO

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING OAKLAND

v. COUNTY’S MOTION TO APPOINT

LEAD PLAINTIFF AND LEAD

TESLA, INC., et al., COUNSEL Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 14, 20, 27,

12 In this putative securities class action, Plaintiff Oakland County Voluntary Employees’ Beneficiary Association (“Oakland County VEBA”) and Oakland County Employees’ Retirement System (“Oakland County ERS” and together with Oakland County VEBA, “Oakland County”) filed a motion to be appointed as lead plaintiff pursuant to the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (“PSLRA”), 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4(a)(3)(B). ECF 14. Oakland County also seeks appointment of its counsel, Labaton Sucharow LLP (“Labaton Sucharow”) as lead counsel, and Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP (“Hagens Berman”) as liaison counsel for the putative class. Id. The motion is unopposed. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.