McGee

McGee v. Auto Plus Towing

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 5, 20233:23-cv-03285California1,012 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 ANTHONY MCGEE, Case No. 23-cv-03285-TLT

Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

v. REGARDING SUBJECT MATTER

JURISDICTION

AUTO PLUS TOWING,

Defendant.

11 On June 30, 2023, Plaintiff Anthony McGee (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed a complaint against Auto Plus Towing (“Defendant”). See Pl. [’s] Compl. (“Compl.”), ECF No. 1. Plaintiff’s complaint alleges “acts of fraud” against Defendant in violation of the “United States Code” and alleged violations of California’s “towing law of 2021.” Id. ¶¶ 2, 6,11 “Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction….” Gunn v. Minton, 568 U.S. 251, 256 (2013) (citing Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 511 U.S. 375, 377 (1994) (internal quotation marks omitted)). Courts have a duty to consider its subject matter jurisdiction sua sponte, Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3), and the plaintiff bears the burden of establishing the existence of subject matter jurisdiction. See Leite v. Crane Co., 749…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.