Impinj, Inc. v. NXP USA, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 3, 20234:19-cv-03161-YGRCalifornia2,991 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IMPINJ, INC.,

Case No. 19-cv-3161-YGR Plaintiff, 8 v. PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 4, INCLUDING MOTIONS TO EXCLUDE

NXP USA, INC.,

Dkt. Nos. 238, 240, 263, 269-8, and 297 Defendant.

12 I. Pretrial Issues On Sunday, July 2, the parties sent the Court an email stipulating to excuse Juror Nos. 1, 9, 22, 26, 27, and 35. Said jurors were excused. The Court has provided the parties with a draft of jury instructions for purposes of facilitating further instructions. The Court clarified that the parties should be prepared to proceed with opening statements if a jury is chosen quickly. II. Outstanding Motions to Exclude A. Motion to Exclude Kindler (Dkt. No. 240) The legal framework is not in dispute. Federal Rule of Evidence 702 permits opinion testimony by an expert as long as the witness is qualified and based upon that qualification, the 24…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.