Doe

Doe v. GoodRx Holdings, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 7, 20233:23-cv-00501California1,587 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JANE DOE, et al., Case No. 23-cv-00501-AMO

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' v. MOTION FOR INTERIM CO-LEAD

COUNSEL

GOODRX HOLDINGS, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 86 Defendants.

12 Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion to appoint interim co-lead class counsel, submitted by all Plaintiffs’ counsel who have entered an appearance in this matter. The motion requests the following counsel structure in this putative class action: the firm Lowey Dannenberg, P.C. (“Lowey Dannenberg”) and Bursor & Fisher, P.A. (“Bursor & Fisher”) as interim co-lead counsel, to be supported by the firm Schubert Jonckheer & Kolbe LLP as liaison counsel, and an executive committee comprised of counsel from Shub & Johns LLC, Zimmerman Law Offices, P.C., and Israel David LLC. In its discretion, the Court finds that the motion is suitable for decision without oral argument. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons set forth below, the Court hereby GRANTS …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.