Spruell

Spruell v. Kijakazi

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 5, 20233:21-cv-09779California2,285 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TENNILLE S., Case No. 21-cv-09779-SI

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR EAJA ATTORNEYS’

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, FEES Defendant. Re: Dkt. No.

12 Before the court is plaintiff Tennille S.’s motion for attorneys’ fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A). Dkt No. 24. Having considered the papers submitted, the Court hereby GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART plaintiff’s motion. 17 BACKGROUND On April 2, 2020, plaintiff filed a case in federal district court, appealing the denial of her application for Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”) and Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) under Title II and XVI of the Social Security Act. See Tennille S. v. Saul, No. 20-cv-2447-EJD (N.D. Cal. Apr. 2, 2020). Plaintiff was appealing the December 26, 2018 unfavorable decision …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.