AT&T Corporation, a New York corporation v. Interstate Holdings, LLC dba Concord Hilton, a California limited liability company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 7, 20233:23-cv-00938California1,181 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 AT&T CORPORATION, A NEW YORK Case No. 23-cv-00938-LJC

CORPORATION,

8 Plaintiff, AMENDED NOTICE RE: DEFAULT 9 JUDGMENT PROCEDURE v. 10

INTERSTATE HOLDINGS, LLC DBA

11 CONCORD HILTON, A CALIFORNIA

LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY,

12 Defendant. 13 14 The Clerk of Court has not yet entered default against Interstate Holdings, LLC dba 15 Concord Hilton, a California limited liability company, as the Clerk has declined to enter default 16 twice (ECF Nos. 16, 19). The Court provides this amended notice to the parties regarding any 17 default judgment motions filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b)(2). In the event 18 that the Clerk enters default, a motion for default judgment shall be filed no later than 45 days 19 from the date of the Clerk’s entry of default. Requests for additional time shall be made in 20 accordance with Civil Local Rule 6-3. 21 In addition, all default judgment motions shall be filed in compliance with Civil Local 22 Rule 7, be structured as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.