Migues

Migues v. State Farm Insurance Companies Fire Claims

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 6, 20233:23-cv-00027California675 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DUSTIN MIGUES,

Case No. 23-cv-00027-RS Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT

STATE FARM INSURANCE

COMPANIES FIRE CLAIMS, et al., Defendants.

15 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), defendant State Farm General Insurance Company’s motion to dismiss the amended complaint filed by pro se plaintiff Dustin Migues is suitable for disposition without oral argument and the hearing set for July 20, 2023, is vacated. As set forth in more detail in the order dismissing the original complaint in this action, Migues appears to contend he is entitled to compensation for “loss of use” of his rental residence under a renter’s insurance policy issued by State Farm. A complaint must contain “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2). While “detailed factual allegations” are not required, a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.