Davis

Johnson v. Davis

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 6, 20235:21-cv-01693California524 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 PAUL DAVID JOHNSON, Case No. 21-cv-01693-JSW

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v. APPOINT COUNSEL

RON DAVIS, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 48 Defendants.

12 Plaintiff’s pro se civil rights case alleges that Defendants were involved in the decision to transfer over 100 prisoners, some of whom were infected with COVID-19, from the California Institute for Men (CIM) to San Quentin State Prison (SQSP) around May 26, 2020, resulting in a COVID-19 outbreak at SQSP. The Court found Plaintiff’s claims cognizable and ordered service on August 4, 2022. Dkt. No. 24. The Court’s service order indicated that the Court “will issue a scheduling order for summary judgment or other dispositive motion briefing after resolution of the common issues in the 22-mc-80066-WHO matter.” Id. On November 16, 2022, Judge Orrick found in the 22-mc-80066-WHO matter that Defendants were not entitled to qualified or other immunity. Dkt. No. 40. Defendants…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.