Aguilera

Aguilera v. Celis

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 10, 20233:23-cv-00585California2,308 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CARLOS AGUILERA, Case No. 23-cv-00585-HSG Plaintiff, ORDER OF SERVICE Vv. R. CELIS, Defendant. g

Plaintiff, an inmate at California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility (‘CSATF’”), has filed

|| apro se action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against San Quentin State Prison (“SQSP”) o || correctional officer R. Celis. For the reasons set forth below, the Court finds that the complaint 16 |] states cognizable Eighth Amendment claims against defendant Celis and orders service.

s DISCUSSION

WL Procedural History On March 15, 2023, the Court conducted an initial screening of the complaint. In relevant 20 || part, the Court summarized the complaint as follows: Correctional Officer Celis placed a known enemy inmate in the same cell as Mr. Aguilera and told him that he was in deep trouble and then left the area. The other inmate attacked Mr. Aguilera…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.