May

May v. Philo, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 7, 20233:23-cv-01394California1,246 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TOMIKA MAY, et al., Case No. 23-cv-01394-MMC

Plaintiffs, ORDER DEFERRING RULING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS; v. GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT'S

MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY;

PHILO, INC., SETTING FURTHER BRIEFING

SCHEDULE; CONTINUING HEARING;

Defendant. CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT

CONFERENCE

12 13 Before the Court are two motions filed May 17, 2023, by defendant Philo, Inc. ("Philo"): (1) "Motion to Dismiss the Class Action Complaint"; and (2) "Motion to Stay Discovery Pending Resolution of Defendant Philo, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss the Class Action Complaint." Plaintiffs Tomika May ("May") and Matthew Kirschenbaum ("Kirschenbaum") have filed opposition,1 to which Philo has replied. Having read and considered the parties' respective written submissions, the Court, as discussed below, finds it appropriate to defer ruling on the motion to dismiss, to allow plaintiffs…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.