Amezcua
Amezcua v. Nordstrom, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 CONSUELO AMEZCUA, Case No.22-cv-00453-NC
Plaintiff, ORDER OF CONDITIONAL
DISMISSAL
— . = Re: Dkt. No.
NORDSTOM, INC.,
14 Defendant.
16 The Court having been notified of the settlement of this action, and it appearing that || no issue remains for the Court’s determination, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT this 19 || action and all claims asserted herein are DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of the || Court is directed to administratively close this case. Any party may move to reopen the || case, provided that such motion is filed within 30 days. All scheduled dates are || VACATED. The Court retains jurisdiction over this case for 30 days. See Kokkonen v. Guardian || Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 381 (1994). IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 || Dated: July 11, 2023 h_<————~_