Lesnik v.Eisenmann SE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 GREGOR LESNIK and STJEPAN Case No. 16-cv-01120-BLF

PAPES,

9 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF v. STJEPAN PAPES’ MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS EISENMANN SE, et al., RE CLAIM 9; AND DIRECTING PLAINTIFF PAPES TO SUBMIT A Defendants. PROPOSED FINAL JUDGMENT 13 [Re: ECF 618]

15 Before the Court is Plaintiff Stjepan Papes’ motion for attorneys’ fees and costs in connection with Claim 9 of the operative third amended complaint (“TAC”). See Mot., ECF 618. The motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as discussed below. I. BACKGROUND This case was filed in 2016 and thereafter was litigated before District Judge Lucy H. Koh for nearly six years before it was reassigned the undersigned judge in 2022. The TAC alleges that Defendants ISM Vuzem d.o.o., ISM…