Rodriguez
Rodriguez v. Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 MARINO JAIR RODRIGUEZ, et al., Case No. 23-cv-01379-VKD
Plaintiffs,
ORDER FOR REASSIGNMENT TO
v. DISTRICT JUDGE
SANTA CLARA VALLEY Re: Dkt. Nos. 17, 20 TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, et al., 12 Defendants.
13 The operative complaint in this action is the second amendment complaint (“SAC”). Dkt. No. 14. The SAC asserts seven claims against defendants Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (“VTA”), Shaw HR Consulting, Inc. (“Shaw HR”), and 100 unnamed Doe defendants. Id. VTA is the only defendant that has appeared in the action, and it is not clear whether defendant Shaw HR, or any other defendant, has been served.1 On June 13, 2023, plaintiffs filed a motion for leave to file a third amended complaint (“TAC”). Dkt. No. 17. The proposed TAC asserts the following claims for relief against VTA, Shaw HR, and 100 unnamed Doe defendants: (1) violation of the First Amendment of the U.S. …