Gorsline
Gorsline v. Nutanix, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
2 Case No. 4:23-cv-01827-YGR 3 ALEXANDER GORSLINE, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly ORDER APPOINTING LEAD PLAINTIFF AND Situated, APPROVING SELECTION OF LEAD Plaintiff, COUNSEL Re: Dkt. No. 12, 27 vs.
NUTANIX, INC., RAJIV RAMASWAMI,
8 DUSTON WILLIAMS, and RUKMINI
SIVARAMAN,
Defendants.
Now before the Court is movant Alexander Gorsline’s motion for appointment of lead plaintiff, and for approval of his selection of lead counsel. (Dkt. No. 12.) For the reasons set forth below, the motion is GRANTED.1 I. APPOINTMENT OF LEAD PLAINTIFF The PSLRA instructs district courts “to select as lead plaintiff the one ‘most capable of adequately representing the interests of class members.’” In re Cavanaugh, 306 F.3d 726, 729 (9th Cir. 2002) (quoting 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4(a)(3)(B)(i)). This is done through a three-step process. “The first step consists of publicizing the pendency of the action, the claims made and the purported class period. 15 U.S.C. §…