Corallo

Corallo v. NSO Group Technologies Limited

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 10, 20233:22-cv-05229California1,028 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRANCESCO CORALLO,

Case No. 22-cv-05229-RS Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER SUSPENDING DISCOVERY AND RESETTING BRIEFING

NSO GROUP TECHNOLOGIES SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO

LIMITED, et al., DISMISS Defendants.

15 Defendant Q Cyber and its wholly owned subsidiary, defendant NSO Group, are Israeli companies (collectively “NSO”). NSO moved to dismiss plaintiff Francesco Corallo’s complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction and/or on grounds of forum non conveniens.1 The motion was supported by a fourteen paragraph declaration from NSO’s chief executive office asserting, in essence, that NSO is based in Israel; that it has no offices in California or elsewhere in the U.S.; that sales of its technology are strictly monitored and regulated by the Government of Israel, and restricted to governmental entities engaged in investigating and preventing criminal activity and terrorism, and;…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.