Harville

Harville v. Three Wishes Foods, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 13, 20235:22-cv-04774California1,812 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 LYDIA HARVILLE, Case No. 5:22-cv-04774-EJD

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

STAY CASE

v.

THREE WISHES FOODS, INC., Re: ECF No. 34 Defendant.

Before the Court is Defendant Three Wishes Foods Inc.’s (“Three Wishes”) Motion to Stay Case pending Ninth Circuit decisions. The Court finds this motion suitable for decision without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). In consideration of the parties’ moving papers and in weighing the competing interests, the Court GRANTS the motion and STAYS the case. Plaintiff Lydia Harville brings this class action against Three Wishes seeking redress for the brand’s allegedly deceptive practices in labeling and marketing the amount of protein on its cereal packages and unlawfully fortifying its cereal. Compl., ECF No. 1. Three Wishes uses plant-based proteins in its cereal products, such as proteins derived from chickpea, pea, and …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.