IN RE WELLS FARGO & COMPANY HIRING PRACTICES DERIVATIVE LITIGATION
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
IN RE WELLS FARGO & COMPANY
HIRING PRACTICES DERIVATIVE Case No. 22-cv-05173-TLT
LITIGATION
8 All Related Actions
ASBESTOS WORKERS PHILADELPHIA
WELFARE AND PENSION FUND, et al., Case No. 23-cv-01168-TLT Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO v. INTERVENE; GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE MOTION; RELATING CASE CHARLES W. SCHARF, et al., Re: ECF Nos. 38, 55 Defendants. 14 Pending before the Court is Amy Cook’s (“Cook”) motion to intervene and to stay action 15 and Asbestos Workers Philadelphia Welfare and Pension Fund and Jose F. Isais’s (“Asbestos”) 16 motion for leave to file a motion for consolidation and reconsideration. ECF Nos. 38, 55. The 17 Court finds that these motions can be resolved without oral argument. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). 18 After considering the parties’ papers, the Court GRANTS Cook’s motion to intervene, 19 DENIES the motion to stay, and GRANTS Asbestos’s motion for leave to file a motion for 20 consolidation and…