Moore

Moore v. Mars Petcare US, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 12, 20233:16-cv-07001California5,333 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TAMARA MOORE, et al., Case No. 16-cv-07001-MMC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON CLAIMS

FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

MARS PETCARE US, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

12 By order filed March 28, 2023 (see Dkt. No. 250), the Court denied in part defendant Royal Canin U.S.A., Inc.’s (“Royal Canin”) “Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiff Greta Ervin’s Claims” (see Dkt. No. 222) and defendant Mars Petcare U.S., Inc.’s (“Mars”) “Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiff Renee Edgren’s Claims” (see Dkt. No. 223) (hereinafter, “Original Motions”), and deferred ruling on the question of available relief pending submission of supplemental briefing thereon. Now before the Court are Royal Canin’s motion, filed April 21, 2023, “for Summary Judgment on Plaintiff Greta Ervin’s Claims for Injunctive Relief” (see Dkt. No. 255), and Mars’s motion, filed April 21, 2023, “for Summary Judgment on Plaintiff Renee Edgren’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.