Fox

Fox v. Clark

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 17, 20233:21-cv-04993California871 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 LAMAR FOX, Case No. 21-cv-04993-JD

Petitioner,

ORDER RE STAY AND SHOW CAUSE

v. 9 Re: Dkt. Nos. 11, 12 KEN CLARK, Respondent.

12 Lamar Fox, a state prisoner, filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. This action was stayed pending the resolution in the California Supreme Court of In re Lopez, No. S258912. Petitioner indicates that the California Supreme Court issued a ruling in Lopez that is beneficial to him and that his claims are exhausted. BACKGROUND Petitioner and a codefendant were found guilty by a jury of murder, attempted murder and related offenses. People v Thompkins, 50 Cal. App. 5th 365, 375 (May 1, 2020). Petitioner was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole, plus 224 years to life. Id. The California Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment but remanded the case for resentencing on several counts. Id. at 420. On August 26, 2020, the California…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.