Peterson

Peterson v. The Glad Products Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 17, 20233:23-cv-00491California3,385 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 PATRICK PETERSON, Case No. 23-cv-00491-TSH

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS

THE GLAD PRODUCTS COMPANY, et Re: Dkt. No. 34 al., 10 Defendants. 11 I. INTRODUCTION Patrick Peterson brings this putative class action against The Glad Products Company and The Clorox Company concerning the labeling on Defendants’ Glad® “Recycling” bags. Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), in which Defendants argue Peterson lacks Article III standing to seek injunctive relief. ECF No. 34. Peterson filed an Opposition (ECF No. 39) and Defendants filed a Reply (ECF No. 41). The Court finds this matter suitable for disposition without oral argument and VACATES the July 20, 2023 hearing. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons stated below, the Court DENIES the motion.1 II. BACKGROUND Defendants manufacture and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.