Bailey

Bailey v. Zendesk, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 12, 20235:23-cv-01243California1,425 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 BRIAN BAILEY, et al., Case No. 23-cv-01243-JSC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE: MOTION FOR

v. APPOINTMENT AS CO-LEAD

PLAINTIFFS AND COUNSEL

ZENDESK, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 13 Defendants.

12 Brian Bailey and Scott Franklin move for appointment as co-lead plaintiffs in this securities action under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“PSLRA”), 15 U.S.C. § 78u–4. Plaintiffs sued as individuals but refer to themselves in this motion as the “B&F Group.” No party submitted a competing motion for appointment as lead plaintiff. After carefully considering the arguments and briefing submitted, the Court concludes that oral argument is unnecessary, see Civ. L.R. 7-1(b), and GRANTS Plaintiffs motion to be appointed co-lead plaintiffs. The hearing set for July 13, 2023 is vacated. DISCUSSION The PSLRA directs district courts to appoint the lead plaintiff through a three-step process: (1) the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.