Laatz

Laatz v. Zazzle, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 17, 20235:22-cv-04844California10,045 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 NICKY LAATZ, et al., Case No. 22-cv-04844-BLF

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS FIRST AMENDED

COMPLAINT

ZAZZLE, INC., et al., [Re: ECF No. 86] Defendants.

12 Plaintiff Nicky Laatz (“Plaintiff”) brings this suit alleging that Defendant Zazzle, Inc. (“Zazzle”), through its employee, Defendant Mohamed Alkhatib (“Alkhatib,” and, with Zazzle, “Defendants”), fraudulently obtained a license to use software implementing a trio of fonts created by Plaintiff, and subsequently violated the license by making the fonts available to millions of people, including for commercial use. The operative First Amended Complaint asserts claims for (1) fraudulent misrepresentation, (2) fraudulent concealment, and (3) promissory fraud, all in violation of Cal. Civ. Code § 1572, as well as (4) federal copyright infringement under 17 U.S.C. § 101, (5) federal trademark infringement under 15 U.S.C. § 1114, and (6) breach of contract. Presently…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.