Zimmerman
Zimmerman v. L'Oreal USA, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 LYNN ZIMMERMAN, Case No. 22-cv-07609-HSG
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART MOTION TO
v. DISMISS
L’ORÉAL USA, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 26 Defendant.
12 Pending before the Court is Defendant L’Oréal USA, Inc.’s motion to dismiss. Dkt. No. 26 (“Mot.”). The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons detailed below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the motion. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Lynn Zimmerman filed this putative class action alleging that Defendant misleadingly advertises the sunscreen benefits of some of its cosmetic products. Dkt. No. 9 (“Compl.”). Plaintiff alleges that she purchased L’Oréal Infallible Fresh Wear 24HR Foundation on multiple occasions from local retailers. Id. ¶¶ 55–56. Plaintiff further alleges that the foundation’s front…