So

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 HENRY SO, et al., Case No. 22-cv-02327-BLF

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING IN PART AND

v. GRANTING IN PART WITH LEAVE

TO AMEND IN PART AND WITHOUT

HP, INC., LEAVE TO AMEND IN PART

MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST

Defendant. AMENDED COMPLAINT

[Re: ECF No. 38]

13 In this case, Plaintiffs Henry So and Daniel Dyke allege that Defendant HP, Inc. (“HP”) remotely transmits firmware updates to HP printers that make third-party ink and toner supply cartridges incompatible with those HP printers. They bring common law and state and federal statutory claims, and they seek to represent various classes of consumers who purchased identified HP printers. Now before the Court is HP’s motion to dismiss. ECF No. 38 (“MTD”); see also ECF No. 42 (“Reply”). Plaintiffs oppose the motion. ECF No. 40 (“Opp.”). The Court held a hearing on 21 …