Bruggeman

Jiaxing Super Lighting Electric Appliance Co., LTD. v. Bruggeman

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 18, 20233:21-cv-08489California4,419 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 JIAXING SUPER LIGHTING ELECTRIC Case No. 21-cv-08489-MMC

APPLIANCE CO., LTD.,

7 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT SIGNIFY HOLDING B.V.'S MOTION v. TO DISMISS THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT JOHN BRUGGEMAN, et al., 10 Defendants. 11 Before the Court is defendant Signify Holding B.V.’s (“Signify”) motion, filed May 25, 2023, “to Dismiss Third Amended Complaint,” whereby Signify seeks dismissal of one of the claims in the Third Amended Verified Complaint (“TAC”), the operative pleading in the instant action. Plaintiff Jiaxing Super Lighting Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. (“Super Lighting”) has filed opposition, to which Signify has replied. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court rules as follows.1 BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY In the TAC, Super Lighting asserts against Signify a single cause of action for “Actual and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.