In re ALPHABET, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 20, 20233:18-cv-06245California535 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 In re ALPHABET, INC. SECURITIES Case No. 18-cv-06245-JSW

LITIGATION

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM NONDISPOSITIVE

PRETRIAL ORDER OF MAGISTRATE

JUDGE Re: Dkt. No. 185

17 The Court has received Plaintiff’s motion for relief from a nondispositive pretrial order of a magistrate judge. Plaintiff seeks relief from Magistrate Judge Ryu’s discovery order dated June 22, 2023 (“Discovery Order”). (Dkt. No. 175.) The District Court may modify or set aside any portion of a magistrate’s ruling on non- dispositive pre-trial motions found to be “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a); see also, e.g., Grimes v. City and County of San Francisco, 951 F.2d 236, 241 (9th Cir. 1991). A ruling is clearly erroneous if the reviewing court, after considering the evidence, is left with the “definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.” United States…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.