Bonazza

Bonazza v. MUFG Bank, Ltd.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 18, 20233:23-cv-01161California460 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL ALAN BONAZZA,

Case No. 23-cv-01161-JCS Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER STRIKING DKT. NO. 73 9 MUFG UNION BANK, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 73 10 Defendants.

12 In light of Plaintiff’s repeated filing of unauthorized documents in this case, the Court has ordered that any document Plaintiff files must cite to one of the following sources of authority permitting the filing: 1) a rule of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (e.g., Rule 12(b)(6), Rule 56); 2) a rule of the Northern District of California’s Civil Local Rules (e.g. Civil Local Rule 7, setting deadlines for motions and responsive briefs); or 3) an Order of this Court (e.g. a case management order, such as docket no. 35, requiring that the parties file a case management statement). See dkt. no. 66. Docket no. 73, entitled “Motion to Depose[,]” does not cite any rule or Court order that authorizes it. Furthermore, the document violates the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.