Malachowski

Malachowski v. Doheny

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 20, 20233:21-cv-05751California7,965 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 MARK MALACHOWSKI, Case No. 21-cv-05751-VKD

Plaintiff, ORDER FOR REASSIGNMENT TO A v. DISTRICT JUDGE

ROMONA A. DOHENY, R PLE APO INR TT IF & F 'R SE RC EO NM EWM EE DN D MA OT TIO ION N R E Defendant. FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT

RE: DKT. NO.

Plaintiff Mark Malachowski, an attorney, brings this lawsuit against his former client, defendant Romona Doheny, for failure to pay for legal services he provided. After Ms. Doheny failed to respond to repeated attempts at service over approximately 18 months, the Clerk entered a default against her. Dkt No. 48. The Court denied Mr. Malachowski’s prior motion for default judgment without prejudice. Dkt. No. 52. He now files this renewed motion. Dkt. No. 53. Because Ms. Doheny has not appeared in this action and is in default, this Court does not have the consent of all parties. 28 U.S.C. § 636(c); Fed.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.