Chung

Chung v. County of Santa Clara

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 20, 20233:21-cv-07583California7,313 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DANIEL CHUNG, Case No. 21-cv-07583-AMO

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

JEFFREY F. ROSEN, Re: Dkt. No. 92 Defendant.

12 Defendant Jeffrey F. Rosen’s Motion for Summary Judgment was heard before this Court on June 15, 2023. Having read the papers filed by the parties and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby GRANTS Defendant’s Motion, for the following reasons. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background This case’s remaining claims involve the actions taken by the Santa Clara County District Attorney, Jeffrey F. Rosen (“DA Rosen”) following the publication of an opinion piece by Plaintiff Daniel Chung, who was then a Deputy District Attorney. Chung alleges that DA Rosen and his office retaliated against him for publishing an unauthorized opinion piece on criminal justice…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.