Fuqua

Fuqua v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 21, 20234:19-cv-05401-HSGCalifornia1,009 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TAMMI FUQUA, Case No. 19-cv-05401-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

APPOINT COUNSEL AND

v. TERMINATING AS MOOT IN PART

AND DENYING IN PART MOTION

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 25,

12 In its February 15, 2023 Order Terminating Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, the Court explained that “[f]ailure to file an amended complaint in accordance with this order [by March 14, 2023] may result in dismissal of this action without further notice to Plaintiff.” Dkt. No. 24 at 1. As of the date of this order, Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Instead, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Appoint Counsel, Dkt. No. 25, and a Motion for Extension of Time, Dkt. No. 26. I. MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL “There is no constitutional right to appointed counsel for employment discrimination claims.” Ivey v. Bd. of Regents of Univ. of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.