Fuqua
Fuqua v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TAMMI FUQUA, Case No. 19-cv-05401-HSG
Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
APPOINT COUNSEL AND
v. TERMINATING AS MOOT IN PART
AND DENYING IN PART MOTION
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 25,
12 In its February 15, 2023 Order Terminating Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, the Court explained that “[f]ailure to file an amended complaint in accordance with this order [by March 14, 2023] may result in dismissal of this action without further notice to Plaintiff.” Dkt. No. 24 at 1. As of the date of this order, Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Instead, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Appoint Counsel, Dkt. No. 25, and a Motion for Extension of Time, Dkt. No. 26. I. MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL “There is no constitutional right to appointed counsel for employment discrimination claims.” Ivey v. Bd. of Regents of Univ. of…