Johnson v. City of San Jose

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 19, 20235:21-cv-01849California1,177 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 KYLE JOHNSON, Case No. 21-cv-01849-BLF (VKD)

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE JULY 13, 2023

v. DISCOVERY DISPUTE RE REQUEST

FOR ADDITIONAL RULE 30(B)(6)

CITY OF SAN JOSE, et al., DEPOSITION TIME Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 104

13 The parties ask the Court to resolve their dispute regarding plaintiff Kyle Johnson’s request for additional time to take a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition of defendant City of San Jose (“City”). Dkt. No. 104. This dispute follows an earlier dispute concerning the same Rule 30(b)(6) deposition that the parties ask the Court to resolve after the close of fact discovery. See Dkt. No. 96. In resolving that dispute, the Court ordered as follows: 19 The City must provide testimony regarding Topics 1 (as narrowed), 4-6, 10, and 11, in addition to the topics on which the parties previously agreed. The deposition will be limited to no more than 7 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.