Badr

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALI BADR,

Case No. 4:21-cv-09575-YGR Plaintiff, ORDER REQUESTING FURTHER BRIEFING v.

CITY OF SAN RAMON ET AL.,

9 Defendants. 10 Before the Court is city and law enforcement defendants’1 (hereinafter, the “settling defendants”) motion for determination of good faith settlement with plaintiff Ali Badr. (Dkt. No. 96.) The motion is opposed by defendants John Blomeke and Carmommy Rentals (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Carmommy”). (Dkt. No. 97.) The Court requires further briefing on the question of allocation. Settling defendants argue that they do not need to make a showing of allocation, because there is only one plaintiff. They seem to indicate that any further questions about allocation should be addressed after trial. Carmommy argues that a more detailed allocation of damages, not just by plaintiff, but by claim, is required. In reply, settling defendants do not address whether they are required to allocate …