Brinson

Brinson v. Garland

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 21, 20233:22-cv-09076California1,213 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 BRAD DANIEL BRINSON, Case No. 22-cv-09076-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: DEFENDANT BONTA’S

v. MOTION TO DISMISS

MERRICK B. GARLAND, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 15 Defendants.

12 Plaintiff sues the Attorneys General of the United States and the State of California for denying him a lawful gun purchase. (Dkt. No. 1.) Before the Court is California Attorney General Rob Bonta’s motion to dismiss. (Dkt. No. 15.) Having carefully considered the briefing, and with the benefit of oral argument on April 19, 2023, the Court GRANTS the motion with leave to amend. DISCUSSION Plaintiff brings claims for erroneous denial of a firearm under 18 U.S.C. § 925A; violation of his Second Amendment rights; and violation of his equal protection rights under the Fourteenth Amendment. (Dkt. No. 1 ¶¶ 46–65.) He seeks declaratory and injunctive relief. Plaintiff sues U.S. Attorney General Merrick B. Garland in his official…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.