SuccessfulMatch.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 REFLEX MEDIA, INC., et al., Case No. 20-cv-06393-JD

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE MOTIONS TO SEAL

v.

SUCCESSFULMATCH.COM, et al., Defendants.

11 The Court has addressed the standards for sealing requests in conjunction with case filings, see In re Google Play Store Antitrust Litigation, 556 F. Supp. 3d 1106 (N.D. Cal. 2021), and that decision is incorporated here. In pertinent summary, “judicial records are public documents almost by definition, and the public is entitled to access by default.” Id. at 1107 (quoting Kamakana v. City & Cty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1180 (9th Cir. 2006); see also Ctr. for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLC, 809 F.3d 1092, 1096 (9th Cir. 2016) (when considering a request to seal, “we start with a strong presumption in favor of access to court records”) (quotation omitted). The party seeking to seal a document bears the burden of articulating “compelling reasons supported by specific factual findings that outweigh the general history of access and the …